RESOLVED FIXED 152224
B3 should not give ValueReps for the non-stackmap children of a CheckValue to the generator callback
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152224
Summary B3 should not give ValueReps for the non-stackmap children of a CheckValue to...
Filip Pizlo
Reported 2015-12-12 22:29:35 PST
Right now, a stackmap generator for a Check has to know how many children the B3 value for the Check had at the time of code generation. That means that B3 cannot change the kind of Check that it was - for example it cannot turn a Check into a Patchpoint and it cannot turn a CheckAdd into a Check. But just changing the contract so that the stackmap generation params only get the stackmap children of the check means that B3 can transform Checks as it likes. This is meant to aid sinking values into checks.
Attachments
the patch (19.57 KB, patch)
2015-12-12 22:31 PST, Filip Pizlo
no flags
the patch (22.32 KB, patch)
2015-12-13 10:33 PST, Filip Pizlo
ggaren: review+
Filip Pizlo
Comment 1 2015-12-12 22:31:49 PST
Created attachment 267255 [details] the patch
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 2 2015-12-12 22:34:38 PST
Attachment 267255 [details] did not pass style-queue: ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5710: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5713: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5746: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5749: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5782: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5819: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5852: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5926: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5929: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5963: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6001: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6039: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6112: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6142: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6177: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6218: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6264: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6267: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6298: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] Total errors found: 19 in 5 files If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Filip Pizlo
Comment 3 2015-12-13 10:33:56 PST
Created attachment 267264 [details] the patch Improved some comments.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 4 2015-12-13 10:36:50 PST
Attachment 267264 [details] did not pass style-queue: ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5710: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5713: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5746: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5749: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5782: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5819: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5852: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5926: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5929: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:5963: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6001: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6039: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6112: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6142: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6177: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6218: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6264: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6267: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] ERROR: Source/JavaScriptCore/b3/testb3.cpp:6298: Consider using CHECK_EQ instead of CHECK(a == b) [readability/check] [2] Total errors found: 19 in 6 files If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Geoffrey Garen
Comment 5 2015-12-14 11:37:43 PST
Comment on attachment 267264 [details] the patch r=me
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.