WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of
bug 88064
91490
[Qt][WK2] REGRESSION(
r122770
) - it made ~ 160 fails on WebKit2
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91490
Summary
[Qt][WK2] REGRESSION(r122770) - it made ~ 160 fails on WebKit2
János Badics
Reported
2012-07-17 04:01:50 PDT
156 tests fail on WebKit2 since
r122768
or
r122771
.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 1
2012-07-17 04:04:10 PDT
(In reply to
comment #0
)
> 156 tests fail on WebKit2 since
r122768
or
r122771
.
... or any change in between the two.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 2
2012-07-17 04:11:03 PDT
This is definitely not a jsc issue.
Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Comment 3
2012-07-17 05:21:41 PDT
r122769
is a rounding change (from floored int to rounded int for us), that could likely change metrics slightly all over the place.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 4
2012-07-17 05:47:41 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
>
r122769
is a rounding change (from floored int to rounded int for us), that could likely change metrics slightly all over the place.
I rather suspect on
r122770
, I'm going to check these changes invidually (on 67).
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 5
2012-07-17 06:00:40 PDT
This is caused by
r122770
(bisected).
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 6
2012-07-17 06:03:35 PDT
Link of results:
http://build.webkit.sed.hu/results/x86-64%20Linux%20Qt%20Release%20WebKit2%20(Amazon%20EC2)/r122771%20(6073)/results.html
(it refers to 71 because 67-70 did not build).
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 7
2012-07-17 10:37:25 PDT
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/122770
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 8
2012-07-17 10:38:46 PDT
Links make it easy to see what the change in question was. Also relating to the original bug may help get the attention of the authors of the original change, if that's your goal.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 9
2012-07-17 11:00:20 PDT
I find it hard to believe that
r122770
caused those changes.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 10
2012-07-18 02:14:29 PDT
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> Links make it easy to see what the change in question was. Also relating to the original bug may help get the attention of the authors of the original change, if that's your goal.
Not for making a flame war of it but what is the rationale of blocking a resolved bug? I commented on that bug, I believe it should be enough to get the attention of the authors. Links are good idea, though :)
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 11
2012-07-25 04:42:44 PDT
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
bug 88064
***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug