WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of
bug 90286
90287
[EFL] [GTK] [QT] fast/viewport/viewport-91.html is failing after
r121555
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90287
Summary
[EFL] [GTK] [QT] fast/viewport/viewport-91.html is failing after r121555
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
Reported
2012-06-29 08:43:09 PDT
fast/viewport/viewport-91.html is failing after
r121555
and should be skipped until
bug 90286
is fixed.
Attachments
Patch
(2.46 KB, patch)
2012-06-29 08:57 PDT
,
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(4.18 KB, patch)
2012-07-01 06:09 PDT
,
Balazs Kelemen
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(2)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
Comment 1
2012-06-29 08:57:18 PDT
Created
attachment 150192
[details]
Patch
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 2
2012-06-29 11:52:38 PDT
Comment on
attachment 150192
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 150192 Committed
r121579
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/121579
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 3
2012-06-29 11:52:43 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 4
2012-07-01 03:46:50 PDT
Doesn't it mean that the patch is bad? If so, why don't we revert instead? Or maybe we just need to change some call sites in wk2 platform code?
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 5
2012-07-01 05:43:18 PDT
Here is the diff on Qt: -viewport size 320x356 scale 1.000000 with limits [1.000000, 5.000000] and userScalable -1.000000 +viewport size 480x534 scale 1.000000 with limits [1.000000, 5.000000] and userScalable -1.000000 Relevant parts of the test: <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width"> layoutTestController.dumpConfigurationForViewport(240, 480, 564, 480, 534); So we don't divide the width and height dimensions with 1.5 (240/160), which is surprising, since the patch keeps the division, just organize it to the call sites.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 6
2012-07-01 06:09:41 PDT
Reopening to attach new patch.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 7
2012-07-01 06:09:50 PDT
Created
attachment 150329
[details]
Patch
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 8
2012-07-01 06:11:38 PDT
> So we don't divide the width and height dimensions with 1.5 (240/160), which is surprising, since the patch keeps the division, just organize it to the call sites.
... but it turned it to an int division :)
Konrad Piascik
Comment 9
2012-07-01 06:23:28 PDT
I've already got a patch for this in
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90286
But commit queue was being a little stupid so I'd need to re-submit. I don't have time to do this till Tuesday, so you can push this patch now and close the other bug or wait for me to update mine.
Build Bot
Comment 10
2012-07-01 06:34:50 PDT
Comment on
attachment 150329
[details]
Patch
Attachment 150329
[details]
did not pass win-ews (win): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/13113854
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 11
2012-07-02 00:38:44 PDT
(In reply to
comment #9
)
> I've already got a patch for this in
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90286
But commit queue was being a little stupid so I'd need to re-submit. I don't have time to do this till Tuesday, so you can push this patch now and close the other bug or wait for me to update mine.
Well, my patch did not build on Windows, so instead I lent your patch -
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/121661
. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
bug 90286
***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug