Created attachment 327802 [details] Patch

Comment on attachment 327802 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=327802&action=review Storage::remove(const Key& key) probably needs one too before removeFromPendingWriteOperations() call. > Source/WebKit/NetworkProcess/cache/NetworkCacheStorage.cpp:672 > + auto protectedThis = makeRef(*this); > + > ASSERT(m_activeReadOperations.contains(&readOperation)); > m_activeReadOperations.remove(&readOperation); Alternatively these could do auto toDelete = m_activeReadOperations.take(&readOperation); > Source/WebKit/NetworkProcess/cache/NetworkCacheStorage.cpp:925 > RunLoop::main().dispatch([this, &traverseOperation] { > traverseOperation.handler(nullptr, { }); > + > + auto protectedThis = makeRef(*this); > + > m_activeTraverseOperations.remove(&traverseOperation); This is not strictly needed here but I guess it is good documentation.

Thanks for the review! (In reply to Antti Koivisto from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 327802 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=327802&action=review > > Storage::remove(const Key& key) probably needs one too before > removeFromPendingWriteOperations() call. Will add one. > > Source/WebKit/NetworkProcess/cache/NetworkCacheStorage.cpp:672 > > + auto protectedThis = makeRef(*this); > > + > > ASSERT(m_activeReadOperations.contains(&readOperation)); > > m_activeReadOperations.remove(&readOperation); > > Alternatively these could do > > auto toDelete = m_activeReadOperations.take(&readOperation); Would be nice but we would need to add UNUSED_PARAM. protectedThis is also widely used and somehow clearer about the meaning.

Created attachment 327810 [details] Patch for landing

The commit-queue encountered the following flaky tests while processing attachment 327810 [details]: svg/animations/animateTransform-pattern-transform.html bug 180121 (authors: ap@webkit.org, arv@chromium.org, krit@webkit.org, mark.lam@apple.com, and zimmermann@kde.org) The commit-queue is continuing to process your patch.

Comment on attachment 327810 [details] Patch for landing Clearing flags on attachment: 327810 Committed r225253: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/225253>

All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.

<rdar://problem/35738687>

> > auto toDelete = m_activeReadOperations.take(&readOperation); > > Would be nice but we would need to add UNUSED_PARAM. > protectedThis is also widely used and somehow clearer about the meaning. No, it doesn't need UNUSED_PARAM. The compiler is smart enough to know about the implicit destructor call. protectedThis is fine too though.