RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED 151296
Modern IDB: "unsigned long" in IDLs should actually means uint32_t in implementation 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151296
Summary Modern IDB: "unsigned long" in IDLs should actually means uint32_t in impleme...
Brady Eidson
Reported 2015-11-15 11:19:02 PST
Modern IDB: "unsigned long" in IDLs should actually means uint32_t in implementation Instead we've perpetuated "unsigned long" throughout the IDB code which is not correct. See https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151196#c3 for more.
Attachments
Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Brady Eidson
Comment 1 2016-03-01 21:47:00 PST
Changing dependency so this doesn't block the feature bug (Certainly not critical for pencils down)
Anne van Kesteren
Comment 2 2023-12-28 08:49:51 PST
This appears to have been addressed.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.