WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
REOPENED
144256
REGRESSION(
r183072
): dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit fails on AArch64 Linux
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144256
Summary
REGRESSION(r183072): dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cji...
Csaba Osztrogonác
Reported
2015-04-27 02:41:28 PDT
jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit started to fail intermittently on the EFL Linux AArch64 bot. Maybe it fails on iOS AArch64 too, but I don't know, because there isn't public iOS buildbot. The first failure:
https://build.webkit.org/builders/EFL%20Linux%20AArch64%20Release/builds/455
(
r183204
) 183202-183204 seems to be absolutely unrelated. There are many JSC changes near here:
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/183201
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/183199
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/183162
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/183161
... I'm going to find which commit caused this regression.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 1
2015-04-27 03:28:03 PDT
failure log: jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: DIFF FAILURE! jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: --- ../.tests/jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check-expected.txt 2015-04-27 00:51:01.000000000 -0700 jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: +++ ../jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit.out 2015-04-27 03:26:24.470000000 -0700 jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: @@ -903,8 +903,8 @@ jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: PASS o.f is 897 jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: PASS o.f is 898 jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: PASS o.f is 899 jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: -PASS stuff is 900 jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: -PASS o.f is undefined jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: +FAIL stuff should be 900 (of type number). Was undefined (of type undefined). jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: +FAIL o.f should be undefined (of type undefined). Was 900 (of type number). jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: PASS stuff is 901 jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: PASS o.f is undefined jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit: PASS stuff is 902 FAIL: jsc-layout-tests.yaml/js/script-tests/dfg-put-by-id-prototype-check.js.layout-dfg-eager-no-cjit
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 2
2015-04-27 03:40:15 PDT
I can reproduce it on
r183160
too, I'll check older revisions too.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 3
2015-04-27 05:02:19 PDT
I found,
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/183072
is the culprit. The failure can be reproduced on
r183072
, but not before
r183072
.
Michael Saboff
Comment 4
2015-04-27 12:51:49 PDT
We are not seeing this failure on iOS AArch64 testbots.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 5
2015-05-08 02:40:19 PDT
I painted the AArch64 Linux bot green with skipping this flakey test:
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/183989
Zan Dobersek
Comment 6
2017-10-18 02:31:59 PDT
These failures aren't exhibited anymore.
Zan Dobersek
Comment 7
2017-10-18 02:41:28 PDT
(In reply to Zan Dobersek from
comment #6
)
> These failures aren't exhibited anymore.
Reopening because the test hasn't been unskipped yet. Otherwise, yes, this failure isn't exhibited anymore.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug