NEW 142258
fast/css/object-fit/object-fit-canvas.html has tiny test failure
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142258
Summary fast/css/object-fit/object-fit-canvas.html has tiny test failure
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Reported 2015-03-03 21:27:26 PST
fast/css/object-fit/object-fit-canvas.html keeps failing on EWS with a 0.01% image diff.
Attachments
a diff from my machine (9.56 KB, image/png)
2015-03-04 16:58 PST, Alexey Proskuryakov
no flags
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 1 2015-03-03 22:05:18 PST
Marks as flakey image failure in https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/180991
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 2 2015-03-04 00:38:39 PST
This is a recent regression, but I don't know how to identify the culprit.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 3 2015-03-04 09:48:46 PST
The first failure was on 2/28 (bug 140855 comment 8).
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 4 2015-03-04 09:50:11 PST
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 5 2015-03-04 09:52:32 PST
No, it was flaky before that, just didn't happen to fail in a pattern that would make EWS post a comment.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 6 2015-03-04 10:12:07 PST
The first failure was when processing bug 142078. Maybe <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/180790>?
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 7 2015-03-04 16:58:09 PST
Created attachment 247910 [details] a diff from my machine I can reproduce with a lot larger diff on a hidpi machine. That started somewhere between 180791 and 180801, so it's very likely the same issue.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 8 2015-03-04 17:14:07 PST
Wait, it's 1600x1200?! There is positively nothing in this range that could cause this; maybe I got it wrong due to flakiness.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 9 2015-03-04 20:04:38 PST
My searching skills failed me. The test started to flakily fail when an expectation that it flakily fails was removed in <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/180796>! It's still an issue that we should investigate soon though - WebKitTestRunner getting confused about the window size is very much not OK.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 10 2015-03-12 11:22:53 PDT
Looks like there are two issues here. 1. The test legitimately fails with small pixel differences on some machines. Looks like an ATI&Nvidia vs Intel graphics at a first glance. 2. When I run the test on my Mavericks machine, I get 1600x1200 results, and one of these looks like it's upscaled from 800x600.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.