RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 68512 123566
[ATK] Test expectations for a few tests are not right for gtk and efl. 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123566
Summary [ATK] Test expectations for a few tests are not right for gtk and efl.
Lukasz Gajowy
Reported 2013-10-31 06:09:00 PDT
It seems that tests: accessibility/aria-hidden-updates-alldescendants.html accessibility/inline-continuations.html accessibility/render-counter-text.html accessibility/secure-textfield-title-ui.html accessibility/text-role-with-aria-hidden-inside.html should have platform specific (gtk and efl) test expectations due to different implementation of AccessibilityObject - on MAC the tests are passing on EFL and GTK are failing (both use AccessibilityObjectAtk). The explanation (and suggested solution) of the issue is here: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68512
Attachments
Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1 2013-10-31 06:09:17 PDT
<rdar://problem/15361254>
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 2 2013-11-01 03:59:44 PDT
Thanks for reporting this bug, but I wonder why you filed it. It seems to me a duplicate of bug 68512, but maybe I'm missing something?
Lukasz Gajowy
Comment 3 2013-11-04 00:20:29 PST
I've created a separate bug, because there are at least five (the mentioned ones) tests, that have to be fixed by changing the expected result (not only the one that was mentioned in bug 68512). This is the only reason why i created this bug. If you want me to place the patch under bug 68512 i can do it this way.
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 4 2013-11-04 06:44:46 PST
(In reply to comment #3) > I've created a separate bug, because there are at least five (the mentioned > ones) tests, that have to be fixed by changing the expected result (not only > the one that was mentioned in bug 68512). This is the only reason why i created > this bug. If you want me to place the patch under bug 68512 i can do it this > way. Ah, I see. Well, as the root cause is basically the same one, I think the bugs are duplicated. However, I agree that the other bug's description is not accurate considering that more tests are failing, so you can probably use this new one and we'll resolve the other one (which is too specific) as a duplicate.
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 5 2013-11-04 06:44:53 PST
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68512 ***
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 6 2013-11-04 06:45:57 PST
(In reply to comment #5) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68512 *** Argh... I did it wrong. I meant to do it the other way around... anyway, mind using the other one now then? I'll rename it so its description is more accurate. Sorry for the mess :)
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.