WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
NEW
106882
DOM/DOMWalk.html should be improved to have longer run times
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106882
Summary
DOM/DOMWalk.html should be improved to have longer run times
Dominic Cooney
Reported
2013-01-15 01:16:44 PST
As discussed in
bug 102500
, some parts of DOM/DOMWalk.html return a zero run time on the Chromium Win perf bot; comments in the test indicate that some tests run quickly ("This test runs in a short time. We loop a few times in order to avoid small time measurements.") The test should benchmark more work to have a meaningful runtime.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Dominic Cooney
Comment 1
2013-01-15 01:21:59 PST
It is possible that zero is not a time, but a malloced size; I get this on Linux (Release): Running DOM/DOMWalk.html (35 of 113) RESULT DOM: DOMWalk= 0.170817563365 ms median= 0.171975207965 ms, stdev= 0.0042148697281 ms, min= 0.159652893669 ms, max= 0.178565660773 ms RESULT DOM: DOMWalk: JSHeap= 1570248.8 bytes median= 1569720.0 bytes, stdev= 8511.79536754 bytes, min= 1557376.0 bytes, max= 1584208.0 bytes RESULT DOM: DOMWalk: Malloc= 0.0 bytes median= 0.0 bytes, stdev= 0.0 bytes, min= 0.0 bytes, max= 0.0 bytes Finished: 8.950449 s
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 2
2013-01-15 11:21:25 PST
(In reply to
comment #1
)
> It is possible that zero is not a time, but a malloced size; I get this on Linux (Release): > > Running DOM/DOMWalk.html (35 of 113) > RESULT DOM: DOMWalk= 0.170817563365 ms > median= 0.171975207965 ms, stdev= 0.0042148697281 ms, min= 0.159652893669 ms, max= 0.178565660773 ms > RESULT DOM: DOMWalk: JSHeap= 1570248.8 bytes > median= 1569720.0 bytes, stdev= 8511.79536754 bytes, min= 1557376.0 bytes, max= 1584208.0 bytes > RESULT DOM: DOMWalk: Malloc= 0.0 bytes > median= 0.0 bytes, stdev= 0.0 bytes, min= 0.0 bytes, max= 0.0 bytes > Finished: 8.950449 s
Do you know why we're not encountering this problem in the downstream dom_perf? Or are we simply ignoring it?
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug