Code style does not allow currently used member function explanation comments for vfuncs, ipc messages Current style defines that comments must be English sentences. Currently code uses: class GPUProcessConnection : public RefCounted<GPUProcessConnection>, public IPC::Connection::Client { public: /// ... // IPC::Connection::Client void didClose(IPC::Connection&) override; // ... }; When trying to solve this by using: // IPC::Connection::Client overrides. .. then some reviewer complains. When trying to solve this by using: // IPC::Connection::Client .. then another reviewer complains. It is not good that review results of seemingly deterministic rule-based system depends on personal preferences of who happens to review the patch. This causes non-deterministic churn during reviews. The code style could define this case so that there would be no need for personal preferences.