Implement ServiceWorker WindowClient.ancestorOrigins
Created attachment 455895 [details] Patch
Created attachment 455910 [details] Patch
Created attachment 455913 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 455913 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=455913&action=review r=me but watch out before landing because I think I found a correctness bug. > Source/WebCore/workers/service/ServiceWorkerClientData.cpp:62 > + return { identifier, type, frameType, url.isolatedCopy(), lastNavigationWasAppInitiated, isVisible, isFocused, focusOrder, ancestorOrigins }; I bet this should be `crossThreadCopy(ancestorOrigins)`, not `ancestorOrigins`. > Source/WebCore/workers/service/ServiceWorkerClientData.cpp:80 > + while (frame) { nit: I personally think this would look nicer as a for loop (see how it is already implemented in Location::ancestorOrigins()). > Source/WebCore/workers/service/ServiceWorkerWindowClient.h:46 > + bool focused() const { return data().isFocused; } Not a fan of this change as it seems to go against coding style. Booleans without prefixes don't look great.
(In reply to Chris Dumez from comment #4) > Comment on attachment 455913 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=455913&action=review > > r=me but watch out before landing because I think I found a correctness bug. Thanks, will fix it.
Created attachment 456108 [details] Patch for landing
Committed r292105 (249025@main): <https://commits.webkit.org/249025@main> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 456108 [details].
<rdar://problem/91041206>
Reopening to attach new patch.
Created attachment 456140 [details] Patch
This patch modifies the imported WPT tests. Please ensure that any changes on the tests (not coming from a WPT import) are exported to WPT. Please see https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WPTExportProcess
Created attachment 456142 [details] Patch
Uploaded to wrong bug.