Move from "layer flush" terminology to "rendering update"
Created attachment 391002 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 391002 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=391002&action=review > Source/WebCore/page/ChromeClient.h:342 > + virtual bool adjustRenderUpdateThrottling(OptionSet<RenderingUpdateThrottleState>) { return false; } should this be an -ing? > Source/WebKit/WebProcess/WebPage/RemoteLayerTree/RemoteLayerTreeDrawingArea.h:159 > + bool m_nextRenderingUpdateIsImmediate { false }; If we're changing the name, can we change it to something less mysterious?
Created attachment 391010 [details] Patch
Created attachment 391020 [details] Patch
Created attachment 391032 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 391032 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=391032&action=review > Source/WebKit/WebProcess/WebPage/CoordinatedGraphics/DrawingAreaCoordinatedGraphics.cpp:211 > + } > } Weird indentation.
Is there some terminology confusion here with the HTML concept of "rendering update"? To reach visually non-empty state we need to update layout without doing any layer flushes. Should there be a concept of "visual rendering update" or similar?
(In reply to Antti Koivisto from comment #7) > Is there some terminology confusion here with the HTML concept of "rendering > update"? Perhaps, but I was trying to match this terminology on purpose. > To reach visually non-empty state we need to update layout without > doing any layer flushes. Should there be a concept of "visual rendering > update" or similar? Probably!
Comment on attachment 391032 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 391032 Committed r256834: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/256834>
<rdar://problem/59822371>