[ews] add commit-queue build step to clear flags on patch and close the bug.
<rdar://problem/58759929>
Created attachment 389843 [details] WIP
This would also use Bugzilla API key similar to Bug 206511. I think it would be better to store the API key in the passwords.json instead of environment variable as discussed in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206511#c10
Comment on attachment 389843 [details] WIP View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=389843&action=review > Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/ews-build/steps.py:432 > + def _remove_flags_on_patch(self, patch_id): Strikes me as weird that you're having the Mixin own this function. Which actions, other than RemoveFlagsOnPatch, would use it?
Comment on attachment 389843 [details] WIP View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=389843&action=review >> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/ews-build/steps.py:432 >> + def _remove_flags_on_patch(self, patch_id): > > Strikes me as weird that you're having the Mixin own this function. Which actions, other than RemoveFlagsOnPatch, would use it? Other build-steps like Validating Committer/Reviewer would need to modify the flags (set cq-), which would use very similar logic. I think it's better to keep all the bugzilla logic in one place.
Created attachment 390079 [details] Patch
Sample runs: Success: https://ews-build.webkit-uat.org/#/builders/26/builds/425 Failure: https://ews-build.webkit-uat.org/#/builders/26/builds/423
Comment on attachment 390079 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=390079&action=review > Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/ews-build/steps.py:534 > + rc = self.remove_flags_on_patch(patch_id) Nit: not sure rc is actually helpful here, I'd probably just put this call inside self.finished. I don't feel particularly strongly about this, though.
Comment on attachment 390079 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=390079&action=review >> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/ews-build/steps.py:534 >> + rc = self.remove_flags_on_patch(patch_id) > > Nit: not sure rc is actually helpful here, I'd probably just put this call inside self.finished. I don't feel particularly strongly about this, though. I like the function call being explicit for better readability, as it's the most important part of this class/method.
Committed r256026: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/256026>