Bug 89343
| Summary: | fast/files/xhr-response-blob.html differs on all platform | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Csaba Osztrogonác <ossy> |
| Component: | Tools / Tests | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | abarth, kinuko, mrobinson, pnormand, zan |
| Priority: | P2 | ||
| Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 88859 | ||
Csaba Osztrogonác
After http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/120574 XHR_RESPONSE_BLOB is enabled
everywhere, but unfortunately the result of this test is different everywhere.
I updated the Qt results and the platform independent: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/120584
I think this one is the best one - http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt?rev=120584
(But unfortunately it passes only on Mac Lion and Chromium Mac platform - so
./platform/chromium-mac/fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt can be removed.)
Here is the platform diffs (compared to the new fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt)
Group I. (Qt == Chromium == Chromium Mac SnowLeopard)
------------------------------------------------------
--- ./fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
+++ ./platform/qt/fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
-PASS xhr.response.type is "text/javascript"
+FAIL xhr.response.type should be text/javascript. Was application/x-javascript.
--- ./fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
+++ ./platform/chromium/fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
-PASS xhr.response.type is "text/javascript"
+FAIL xhr.response.type should be text/javascript. Was application/x-javascript.
--- ./fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
+++ ./platform/chromium-mac-snowleopard/fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
-PASS xhr.response.type is "text/javascript"
+FAIL xhr.response.type should be text/javascript. Was application/x-javascript.
Group II. (EFL == Chromium Linux == GTK)
-----------------------------------------
--- ./fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
+++ ./platform/efl/fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
-PASS xhr.response.type is "text/javascript"
+FAIL xhr.response.type should be text/javascript. Was application/javascript.
--- ./fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
+++ ./platform/chromium-linux/fast/files/xhr-response-blob-expected.txt
-PASS xhr.response.type is "text/javascript"
+FAIL xhr.response.type should be text/javascript. Was application/javascript.
GTK has same result as Group II, but they don't have checked in expected file.
Have you got any idea why this test has 3 different results
on different platforms, and how can we fix it?
| Attachments | ||
|---|---|---|
| Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc. |
Kinuko Yasuda
Thanks for rebaselining, I've just changed the test not to test javascript type as MIME types for javascript seem to have (historically) some disagreements on platforms.
Will keep an eye if the new test doesn't fail on those platforms.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 89338 ***
Kinuko Yasuda
(In reply to comment #1)
> Thanks for rebaselining, I've just changed the test not to test javascript type as MIME types for javascript seem to have (historically) some disagreements on platforms.
> Will keep an eye if the new test doesn't fail on those platforms.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 89338 ***
And the mime type issue seems to be filed as: bug 58636