Bug 83257

Summary: Add notifications for frame loader deferring and resuming
Product: WebKit Reporter: Leo Yang <leo.yang>
Component: Page LoadingAssignee: Leo Yang <leo.yang>
Status: ASSIGNED    
Severity: Normal CC: abarth, ap, beidson, charles.wei, cmarcelo, dbates, eric, japhet, rwlbuis, staikos, tonikitoo, webkit.review.bot, zimmermann
Priority: P2    
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 73144    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch
none
Patch v2
abarth: review-
Patch v3 none

Leo Yang
Reported 2012-04-05 01:06:28 PDT
Some platforms (so far blackberry) are interested in notifications before a frame loader is deferred and after it is resumed.
Attachments
Patch (4.49 KB, patch)
2012-04-05 01:52 PDT, Leo Yang
no flags
Patch v2 (4.90 KB, patch)
2012-04-05 20:05 PDT, Leo Yang
abarth: review-
Patch v3 (5.88 KB, patch)
2012-04-09 18:53 PDT, Leo Yang
no flags
Leo Yang
Comment 1 2012-04-05 01:52:05 PDT
Antonio Gomes
Comment 2 2012-04-05 07:40:42 PDT
It looks good to me, but I will wait for some "FrameLoader guy" to say something. Btw, it would be nice to say a few words about the usage in the BlackBerry port.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 3 2012-04-05 10:36:13 PDT
This looks quite redundant - deferring doesn't happen all by itself, the client already knows about conditions that cause it.
Leo Yang
Comment 4 2012-04-05 19:19:16 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > This looks quite redundant - deferring doesn't happen all by itself, the client already knows about conditions that cause it. The caller does know the conditions that cause deferring and resuming but the notifications are not redundant. The notifications make caller's life easier, otherwise on every call sites the caller need to iterate the frame loaders for the page twice one for deferring and another one for resuming.
Leo Yang
Comment 5 2012-04-05 20:05:00 PDT
Created attachment 135971 [details] Patch v2 Adding explain that the notifications are used for the blackberry porting.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 6 2012-04-05 20:51:38 PDT
This change still doesn't make sense to me. Load deferring is an implementation detail of WebCore, clients needn't know about it.
Leo Yang
Comment 7 2012-04-05 21:02:08 PDT
(In reply to comment #6) > This change still doesn't make sense to me. Load deferring is an implementation detail of WebCore, clients needn't know about it. Do you think page load is an implementation detail of WebCore? Is it FrameLoaderClient::dispatchDidCommitLoad() necessary for example?
Adam Barth
Comment 8 2012-04-06 11:10:48 PDT
Comment on attachment 135971 [details] Patch v2 I'm not sure it makes sense to notify the client here. Can you explain more about how you're using this notification?
Leo Yang
Comment 9 2012-04-09 18:53:42 PDT
Created attachment 136369 [details] Patch v3 Adding more explaining.
Anders Carlsson
Comment 10 2014-02-05 10:52:45 PST
Comment on attachment 136369 [details] Patch v3 Clearing review flag on patches from before 2014. If this patch is still relevant, please reset the r? flag.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.