| Summary: | [GLIB] REGRESSION(r270882): Several WebSocket tests are failing | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Diego Pino <dpino> |
| Component: | New Bugs | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | achristensen, cgarcia, crzwdjk, csaavedra, pgriffis, webkit-bug-importer, youennf |
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar |
| Version: | WebKit Nightly Build | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
|
Description
Diego Pino
2020-12-16 19:58:24 PST
Looking at the diff, I think it would be ok to just rebaseline the tests instead of marking them as failures. The difference is probably because apple is not using the new web sockets code path in tests yet. (In reply to Carlos Garcia Campos from comment #2) > Looking at the diff, I think it would be ok to just rebaseline the tests > instead of marking them as failures. The difference is probably because > apple is not using the new web sockets code path in tests yet. Right, we have not yet enabled this code path. Overall, when looking at the results from both code paths, there are clear differences. These differences are also where compat with Chrome and/or Firefox is weak. Additional CONSOLE MESSAGE is probably fine, I am less sure about the new ALERT though. Note that the new code path puts more burden on the network stack to be compat with other implementations. I would tend to do the exercise of comparing GTK results with Safari, Chrome and Firefox. If GTK is the only one that differs, I would tend to file an issue on the GTK websocket backend. |