| Summary: | Notify igalia team about pre-existing test failures and build failures for JSC queues | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Aakash Jain <aakash_jain> | ||||
| Component: | Tools / Tests | Assignee: | Aakash Jain <aakash_jain> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | aakash_jain, guijemont, jbedard, pmatos, ryanhaddad, webkit-bot-watchers-bugzilla, webkit-bug-importer | ||||
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar | ||||
| Version: | Other | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| See Also: |
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215948 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217052 |
||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Aakash Jain
2020-09-23 11:14:04 PDT
Created attachment 409487 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 409487 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=409487&action=review > Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/ews-build/emails.json:10 > + "jsc32@igalia.com" Looks fine, but I would like someone from Igalia to verify they want this before we land it. (In reply to Jonathan Bedard from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 409487 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=409487&action=review > > > Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/ews-build/emails.json:10 > > + "jsc32@igalia.com" > > Looks fine, but I would like someone from Igalia to verify they want this > before we land it. Looks like Igalia already verified in Slack that they want this. Committed r267492: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/267492> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 409487 [details]. Comment on attachment 409487 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=409487&action=review >>> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/ews-build/emails.json:10 >>> + "jsc32@igalia.com" >> >> Looks fine, but I would like someone from Igalia to verify they want this before we land it. > > Looks like Igalia already verified in Slack that they want this. Don't know if there's better naming to be had, but technically, that's not the whole jsc team, but only the ones working on embedded/32-bit things. We also have people doing feature work who are not included in that email. Maybe I'm being too pedantic though ;). (In reply to Guillaume Emont from comment #6) > Don't know if there's better naming to be had, but technically, that's not the whole jsc team, but only the ones working on embedded/32-bit things. We also have people doing feature work who are not included in that email. Maybe I'm being too pedantic though ;). I guess specific name doesn't matter so much here. Feel free to change it to a better name though. Restarted buildbot to pick up this change. |