| Summary: | REGRESSION (r263045): TestWTF.Signals.SignalsWorkOnExit crashing | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Ryan Haddad <ryanhaddad> | ||||||
| Component: | New Bugs | Assignee: | Keith Miller <keith_miller> | ||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | benjamin, cdumez, cmarcelo, ews-watchlist, keith_miller, mark.lam, webkit-bot-watchers-bugzilla, webkit-bug-importer | ||||||
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar | ||||||
| Version: | WebKit Nightly Build | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| See Also: | https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213160 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Ryan Haddad
2020-06-15 13:35:05 PDT
Created attachment 401932 [details]
crash log
Created attachment 401934 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 401934 [details]
Patch
r+ to unbreak the API test using Signal::Usr. However, but looks like the only place where we add a signal handler for Signal::Usr is the API tests. Can we just make the test use a different signal and get rid of Signal::Usr altogether. Let's do that in a separate bug though.
(In reply to Mark Lam from comment #4) > Comment on attachment 401934 [details] > Patch > > r+ to unbreak the API test using Signal::Usr. However, but looks like the > only place where we add a signal handler for Signal::Usr is the API tests. > Can we just make the test use a different signal and get rid of Signal::Usr > altogether. Let's do that in a separate bug though. Yeah, it does look unused now. I think we had it because some ports used to use it as their thread suspension method. Committed r263065: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/263065> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 401934 [details]. |