Bug 209480
Summary: | [ macOS wk1 ] webgl/2.0.0/conformance/attribs/gl-vertexattribpointer.html is flaky timing out | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Jacob Uphoff <jacob_uphoff> |
Component: | WebGL | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | dino, jonlee, kbr, kkinnunen, webkit-bot-watchers-bugzilla, webkit-bug-importer |
Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar |
Version: | WebKit Nightly Build | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208078 | ||
Bug Depends on: | 214211 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 126404, 222726 |
Jacob Uphoff
webgl/2.0.0/conformance/attribs/gl-vertexattribpointer.html
This test has been a flaky timeout since it was unskipped in r257283 on macOS wk1 debug.
History:
https://results.webkit.org/?suite=layout-tests&test=webgl%2F2.0.0%2Fconformance%2Fattribs%2Fgl-vertexattribpointer.html
Diff:
--- /Volumes/Data/slave/catalina-debug-tests-wk1/build/layout-test-results/webgl/2.0.0/conformance/attribs/gl-vertexattribpointer-expected.txt
+++ /Volumes/Data/slave/catalina-debug-tests-wk1/build/layout-test-results/webgl/2.0.0/conformance/attribs/gl-vertexattribpointer-actual.txt
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+FAIL: Timed out waiting for notifyDone to be called
This test runs the WebGL Test listed below in an iframe and reports PASS or FAIL.
Test: ../../resources/webgl_test_files/conformance/attribs/gl-vertexattribpointer.html
Attachments | ||
---|---|---|
Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc. |
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
<rdar://problem/60827678>
Jacob Uphoff
Set expectations here: https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/258912/webkit
Kenneth Russell
James, could you please see whether this has been fixed by Bug 214211?
Jon Lee
This appears to remain a flaky timeout on WK1 debug.
Kenneth Russell
This test seems to run very quickly, so it's strange that it would time out flakily in Debug builds. James is OOO for the moment; if this is urgent can anyone else investigate it?
Kimmo Kinnunen
Closing this one out. The test in general is a bit slow.
The solution is to mark the test as Slow in TestExpectations.
Later implementations could be sped up, but relative to other tests, this test probably will remain slowish.